<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Search For Better Search: Winning Usersâ€™ Trust</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.hakia.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=102" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.hakia.com/?p=102</link>
	<description>search for meaning</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 18:23:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0-beta2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Melek Pulatkonak, COO</title>
		<link>http://blog.hakia.com/?p=102&#038;cpage=1#comment-1774</link>
		<dc:creator>Melek Pulatkonak, COO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 16:16:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.hakia.com/?p=102#comment-1774</guid>
		<description>Hi Phil, 

Thanks for sharing your thoughts! Check out Rob&#039;s post (June 19th). 

I did answer your email:-) 

Melek</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Phil, </p>
<p>Thanks for sharing your thoughts! Check out Rob&#8217;s post (June 19th). </p>
<p>I did answer your email:-) </p>
<p>Melek</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil Butler</title>
		<link>http://blog.hakia.com/?p=102&#038;cpage=1#comment-1764</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil Butler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jun 2007 03:36:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.hakia.com/?p=102#comment-1764</guid>
		<description>Hi Melek!
I agree with you as usual and applaud your approach to this increasingly sensitive issue. In a perfect world a person&#039;s search tool would know them rather intimately and would have &quot;safeguards&quot; built in that would never ever reveal anything about the user. I expect this is digitally possible and potentially of supreme value both in terms of PR and intrinsically. What if a search engine, well even something beyond a search engine, could be a confidant if you will. ;)?

Of course the people and the business behind this entity would have ultimate control, but the inherent integrity of such a business along with the innovation would (I expect) be of a value that exceeded all competitors. Of course I know this is where you are headed, but proving it will take time. On Web 2.0 it may be enough to &quot;say it&quot; to begin with but knowing the value and methods of everyone at Hakia I am sure you will discover a meticulous method for demonstrating trustworthiness in short order.

 Assurances and the lack of a need for what Google has taken advantage of will go a long way to being demonstrative in this regard. I hope I can think of some &quot;key&quot; elements that might anchor such &quot;assurances.&quot; BTW answer my email LOL

My Warm Regards Always, 
Phil Butler</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Melek!<br />
I agree with you as usual and applaud your approach to this increasingly sensitive issue. In a perfect world a person&#8217;s search tool would know them rather intimately and would have &#8220;safeguards&#8221; built in that would never ever reveal anything about the user. I expect this is digitally possible and potentially of supreme value both in terms of PR and intrinsically. What if a search engine, well even something beyond a search engine, could be a confidant if you will. <img src='http://blog.hakia.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> ?</p>
<p>Of course the people and the business behind this entity would have ultimate control, but the inherent integrity of such a business along with the innovation would (I expect) be of a value that exceeded all competitors. Of course I know this is where you are headed, but proving it will take time. On Web 2.0 it may be enough to &#8220;say it&#8221; to begin with but knowing the value and methods of everyone at Hakia I am sure you will discover a meticulous method for demonstrating trustworthiness in short order.</p>
<p> Assurances and the lack of a need for what Google has taken advantage of will go a long way to being demonstrative in this regard. I hope I can think of some &#8220;key&#8221; elements that might anchor such &#8220;assurances.&#8221; BTW answer my email LOL</p>
<p>My Warm Regards Always,<br />
Phil Butler</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Melek Pulatkonak, COO</title>
		<link>http://blog.hakia.com/?p=102&#038;cpage=1#comment-1724</link>
		<dc:creator>Melek Pulatkonak, COO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 21:00:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.hakia.com/?p=102#comment-1724</guid>
		<description>Hi Umesh, 

Please bear in mind that our search engine is in BETA operation and not a finished product yet. We are in development mode and are continuously improving the search engine with new features and products. Our capabilities will be more visible as we make progress. 

Please keep on searching at hakia.com!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Umesh, </p>
<p>Please bear in mind that our search engine is in BETA operation and not a finished product yet. We are in development mode and are continuously improving the search engine with new features and products. Our capabilities will be more visible as we make progress. </p>
<p>Please keep on searching at hakia.com!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Umesh</title>
		<link>http://blog.hakia.com/?p=102&#038;cpage=1#comment-1721</link>
		<dc:creator>Umesh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 09:31:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.hakia.com/?p=102#comment-1721</guid>
		<description>Until you filter out spammy SEO&#039;ed sites, you are not adding any value to the Google user. 

But its good.  should pay your bills.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Until you filter out spammy SEO&#8217;ed sites, you are not adding any value to the Google user. </p>
<p>But its good.  should pay your bills.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
